The Eternal Subject
“Aham bhojanam naiva bhojyam na bhokta…
(I am neither the experience, the object of experience, nor the experiencer…)
As the reverberations of the sixth verse faded, Shankara had successfully dismantled the external world, the intimate self, and the spiritual structures built to bridge the two. Yet, one subtle, almost invisible framework remained – the very architecture of perception itself.
Human life is fundamentally built upon a triad. In every waking moment, our reality is structured by three points: the one who knows (jnata), the thing that is known (jneya), and the act of knowing (jnana). This is the Triputi, the threefold division. When you drink water, there is you (the drinker), the water (the drink), and the act of drinking. It is so basic to our functioning that we never question its validity. We assume that reality is inherently fragmented into “me” and “everything else.”
But in the profound silence of his Guru’s presence, Shankara turned his gaze to the very act of experiencing and watched it collapse into a breathtaking unity.
“Aham bhojanam naiva…” I am not the experience.
To state that you are not the experience is to step off the rollercoaster of daily existence. We are constantly defining our lives by the quality of our experiences: a beautiful sunset, a bitter argument, a sudden revelation. We chase the pleasant ones and flee the painful ones. But Shankara recognized that the experience itself is a temporary event. It has a beginning, a middle, and an end. It arises in consciousness, lingers for a moment, and then vanishes. The true Self, eternal and unchanging, cannot be defined by something as fleeting as a passing event.
“…bhojyam…” nor the object of experience.
The world out there – the towering mountains, the faces of loved ones, the concepts in a book – all these are objects. We reach out and grasp them with our senses and our minds. But if the Atman is infinite and all-pervading, how can anything exist outside of it to be grasped as an object? The concept of an “object” requires a distance, a separation. In the realm of absolute non-duality, there is no “out there.” To identify with an object, or to see the world as a collection of separate, solid things, is a trick of the mind. Shankara was stating that the ultimate reality cannot be pinned down and examined as a thing apart from himself.
“…na bhokta…” nor the experiencer.
This was the final, most delicate thread to be cut. We often reach a point in spiritual seeking where we detach from the world (the objects) and detach from the emotional swings (the experiences), and we settle comfortably into the role of the quiet observer (the experiencer). We think, “I am the one watching all of this happen.”
But Shankara, with terrifying clarity, realized that even this “experiencer” is a subtle form of ego. It still implies a center, a point of view, an isolated entity sitting in a dark theater watching the movie of life.
If the Self is truly infinite, it cannot have a localized center. If there is a “me” observing the universe, then there are two things: me and the universe. This is duality.
In a flash of supreme insight, Shankara collapsed the triangle. He realized that the subject, the object, and the process of perception are not three different things interacting; they are a single, indivisible reality appearing as three.
Imagine a dream. In your dream, you might be a traveler (the experiencer) walking on a dusty road (the object) feeling the heat of the sun (the experience). Within the dream, these three elements seem completely separate and real. But when you wake up, you realize that the traveler, the road, and the heat were all made of the exact same substance: the consciousness of the dreamer. There was never any separation. You were the entire dream.
Shankara was waking up from the dream of waking life.
He was articulating a state of mystical union that defies the logical mind. He was no longer a person perceiving a world. The boundary between the inner and the outer had completely dissolved. He was the seer, he was the seeing, and he was the seen. It was a plunge into an ocean where the wave realizes it is not just moving through the water; it is the water.
The young ascetic was resting in a state of sheer, unbroken wholeness. The exhausting effort to hold the universe together through perception had ended. There was no more reaching out, no more pulling away. There was only the singular, shimmering, undivided reality of pure consciousness, vibrating with the silent hum of existence.
In the ultimate awakening, the experiencer, the experience, and the object melt into a single, seamless ocean of awareness.
Leave a Reply